Dec 012010

A humble person is one who, like the humble Mary, says, “The Powerful One has done great things in me.” Each of us has an individual greatness. God would not be our author if we were something worthless. You and I and all of us are worth very much, because we are creatures of God, and God has prodigally given his wonderful gifts to every person. And so the church values human beings and contends for their rights, for their freedom, for their dignity. That is an authentic church endeavor. While human rights are violated, while there are arbitrary arrests, while there are tortures, the church considers itself persecuted, it feels troubled, because the church values human beings and cannot tolerate that an image of God be trampled by persons that become brutalized by trampling on others. The church wants to make that image beautiful.

Oscar Romero, The Violence of Love

Nov 182010

“You have all the grace you need for now. You don’t have to worry about then. When then becomes now you’ll have all the grace you need.”

- Paul David Tripp, Twitter Post, via Of First Importance

I needed to hear this lately. Life has presented a series of challenges, nothing earth shattering, but right in my worry wheel house. It is good to remember that God is in control and that all I need to do is seek Him.

Therefore the sage puts his own person last,

and yet it is found in the foremost place;

he treats his person as if it were foreign to him,

and yet that person is preserved.

Is it not because he has no personal and private ends,

that therefore such ends are realised?

- Tao Te Ching, 7

Whoever finds his life will lose it, and whoever loses his life for my sake will find it. Matthew 10:39

I know that I am stepping out a little with this post. My hope is not to erode Christian faith but rather strengthen it by seeing the similarities and diffierences with other religions. Hopefullly it will also help all to see the rich thought in other faith systems and learn to be more compassionate, literate and understanding of their beliefs.

I really appreciate the thought expressed here in the Tao Te Ching. It reflects nicely with the words of Jesus. Jesus calls his disciples to cease with self-preservation and practice other-awareness. There is a sacred abandonment that takes place, where we loose ourselves, only to find ourselves more perfectly realized.

Yet the call of Jesus has a striking difference from the Tao. In the Tao, self-renunciation is an end in itself. With Jesus, self-renunciation must be coupled with his purposes: "for my sake". In other words, the Tao would say the self-actualization occurs with the act of self-renunciation. Jesus would say that self-actualization would be found with loosing yourself in him. Jesus would say that apart from him, you cannot find yourself – even in self-renunciation.

Nov 012010

Cleveland.com is reporting that abortions in Ohio are at an all-time low. In fact the number has been steadily dropping since 2000. As a pro-lifer, I find this at least on the surface encouraging. There are fewer children being lost in abortion. Although both sides of the argument present reasons for the drop, there is very little information in the article to explain the cause of this drop. Some possible causes that I can think of:

  1. Less unprotected sex – where pregnancy is not desired, there is more use of contraceptives.
  2. More abstinence – at risk groups are less likely to engage in sexual behaviours that result in pregnancy.
  3. More live births – mothers are deciding to keep their children or put them up for adoption.

Although some of the reasons may be less than ideal, I am hopeful with the results.

Go to the Ohio Department of Health for more information. The report can be read in its entirety and it provides some interesting statistics that may help inform us on how to better serve those women who find themselves with an unwanted pregnancy.

Oct 192010

Recently I had a conversation about the nature of the Christian life. When we are saved do we continue to sin or are we completely free from sin? Here are some of my thoughts on the subject.

There are basically two thought processes:

I am a sinner. This viewpoint comes from Scriptures such as:

I John 1:8-9 If we say we have no sin, we deceive ourselves, and the truth is not in us. If we confess our sins, he is faithful and just to forgive us our sins and to cleanse us from all unrighteousness.

I Timothy 1:15 The saying is trustworthy and deserving of full acceptance, that Christ Jesus came into the world to save sinners, of whom I am the foremost.

II Timothy 2:11-13 The saying is trustworthy, for: If we have died with him, we will also live with him; if we endure, we will also reign with him; if we deny him, he also will deny us; if we are faithless, he remains faithful— for he cannot deny himself.

Romans 7:17-20 So now it is no longer I who do it, but sin that dwells within me. For I know that nothing good dwells in me, that is, in my flesh. For I have the desire to do what is right, but not the ability to carry it out. For I do not do the good I want, but the evil I do not want is what I keep on doing. Now if I do what I do not want, it is no longer I who do it, but sin that dwells within me.

I am a saint. Again this viewpoint has its basis in Scripture:

Romans 6:6-9 We know that our old self was crucified with him in order that the body of sin might be brought to nothing, so that we would no longer be enslaved to sin. For one who has died has been set free from sin. Now if we have died with Christ, we believe that we will also live with him. We know that Christ being raised from the dead will never die again; death no longer has dominion over him.

Galatians 2:20 I have been crucified with Christ. It is no longer I who live, but Christ who lives in me. And the life I now live in the flesh I live by faith in the Son of God, who loved me and gave himself for me.

I John 2:1 My little children, I am writing these things to you so that you may not sin. But if anyone does sin, we have an advocate with the Father, Jesus Christ the righteous.

II Corinthians 5:17 Therefore, if anyone is in Christ, he is a new creation. The old has passed away; behold, the new has come.

Both sides have plenty of Scripture to back up their argument. And as such, I must somehow hold onto the truth of all Scripture, not just the ones I like or agree with.

Here are my concerns with each argument:

I am a sinner. Jesus did not die to leave us in our sins and just provide heaven for those who wishfully believe in Him. If we just believe we are a sinner, we can neglect the path of righteousness. Salvation becomes cheap grace. Believed enough, the church begins to look a whole lot like the world – in fact, it is just the world dressed in religious garb.

I am a saint. If we are to live sinless lives, there is an incredible pressure to act and be sinless. To me, this is a form of the law. We try to live perfectly because that is what we are supposed to be. It can be used as a guise for self-righteousness or a way to excuse sin. (If I am perfect then that nasty mean thing I just said must not be sin). We do a lot of rationalizing of sin so that we can appear to be perfect in Christ.

For me this leaves me one option: I must be both sinner and saint. But this definition does not add any clarity since it can sway to either end: sinner or saint. Am I mostly sinner and a little saint or the reverse? Personally, I haven’t completely worked this out theologically but somehow Scripture says both, I must believe both. But here is the best of how I understand it.

The children of Israel left the land of slavery and wandered in the desert for 40 years. After they entered the promised land, they conquered the people occupying the land. But they only conquered the major cities: there were other cities that were not destroyed. The Bible then says that God did it this way because the people were not strong or numerous enough to fully occupy the land. If they completely destroyed the occupying peoples, wild animals would overrun the land and kill the people.

I believe that we are spiritually like that in someways. When Christ saves us, He enacts all of the promises of God. We are a changed person. We are a new creation. There is sin that no longer has control of us. We die with Christ and are raised with Him to newness of life. I believe this type of new creation involves deliverance from every and all gross sin. There is a marked difference between the lives that the world lives and the saints live.

But there are still unconquered territories. There are areas where we are not in full conformity with the mind of Christ. This is the continual process of dying to self, the life of walking in the Spirit. As we grow and mature in Christ, He brings us to these unconquered areas and in His strength, His life, we conquer these areas. We grow more into the image of Christ. This is not our work but the work of the Spirit to continually prepare us to be the spotless bride of Christ. God works into us what Christ has won for us.

For the time, we must endure these unconquered territories. They in some ways are a sign of the grace of God in our lives – because perfection is not perfected in us, He still remains faithful to us. He loves us even while we are an unfinished work. We cannot be presumptuous and try to conquer territories in our own time or strength. We will meet with humiliating defeat. It must be according to the timing, guiding and power of the Holy Spirit. Life in the Spirit is both an act of Christ’s righteousness (saint) and grace (sinner). At the same time, we must remain in the Spirit and move when He wants us to.

Another aspect of the sinner/saint dichotomy is that of reality and potential. The reality is that I am saint of God because of the work of Jesus in my life, past and present. The potential is that I am a sinner if Jesus was not working in my life. This is where I was speaking in the sermon about the chief of sinners. We need to humbly recognize that the work of Christ in our lives is totally of God and not us. We should remember our potential for evil, apart from Christ, so that we do not become proud.

Sometimes we feel that we are not as bad as other people, forgetting that Christ has done the work. We spend our time looking at the sins of others. I believe the saying in 1 Timothy is meant to be a sign of humility, in that we spend more time looking on our past sinfulness and present potential sinfulness than at others’ sins. We need to consider ourselves as the chief of sinners, instead of pointing our fingers at others.

I can’t believe that Paul is speaking only about himself as someone uniquely sinful. I see Paul being humble enough to consider himself the most sinful for the sake not being overly critical of others. Paul realized that grace can be extended to all.

If saying that I am the worst of sinners is to deny the work of Christ in my life, then Paul was also denying the power of Christ in his life. When we say that sin is no more present in the Christian life, aren’t we saying that we are better than Paul (if the verse applies uniquely to him)? How can the man who said “I am crucified with Christ” also say “I am the worst of sinners”? I believe that it is because he lives his life in Christ but knows that he is still capable of sinning, still struggles with some sin and, apart from Christ, could again be the worst sinner.

Sep 232010

Well I have moved my web hosting and in the process have been unable to transfer my previous posts. I will continue to blog until I can figure out what I did wrong.

In the mean time, what are your thoughts about the minimalistic theme?

Patients in ”vegetative” state can think and communicate – Telegraph

A very profound article that has lots of implications to the issues of life and death in patients in a persistent vegetative state. For me, it reminds me to never assume that a patient cannot hear or understand you. Even when a patient is unresponsive, treat them as if they are there and respect them as humans.

In my last post, I looked at the statement that Irenaeus made that Jesus was around 50 years old when He died. Today I want to look at this from a different angle. The Jesus Police suggested a good way to approximate the age of Jesus at death. There are certain markers that we know that were in place at the time of Jesus’ birth and death. By locating those markers in history, we can find out a date range for both his birth and death. Then using those date ranges, we can come up with an age range for Jesus at the time of His death.

Biblical/ historical markers concerning Jesus’ birth

Caesar Augustus (Luke 2:1) Ruled from 27 BC to 14 AD.

Census (Luke 2:1) A census occurred in 6 BC according to Josephus. Quirinius’ census occurred in 6-7 AD.

Herod (Matthew 2:1) Herod died in 4 BC.

Quirinius (Luke 2:2) Governor of Syria from 6-12 AD.

The Star of Bethlehem (Matthew 2:9) Various theories place the celestial occurrence between 12 and 2 BC.

Slaughter of the Innocents (Matthew 2:16) Unknown 

It is generally accepted that Jesus was born sometime between 7 and 4 BC.

Biblical/ historical markers for Jesus’ baptism

Tiberius (Luke 3:1) Tiberius reigned from 14-37 AD.

Based upon Tiberius’ reign and that John the Baptist began ministry when he was around 30 years old, Jesus was born around 1 BC.

Biblical/ historical markers for Jesus’ death

Pontius Pilate (Matthew 27:13) Governor from 26-36 AD.

Caiaphas (Matthew 26:3) High Priest from 18-37 AD.

Herod Antipas (Luke 23:7) Reigned from 4 BC to 39 AD.

The most likely year for Jesus’ death is 33 AD but other years have strong arguments for them.

Now let’s put it all together. The youngest Jesus could have been, based on the latest birthdate and earliest death date, was 20. This is highly unlikely since we know that He was 30 when He began His ministry. The oldest that Jesus could have been was 48. Again this is unlikely since it is based upon an astronomical occurrence and conjecture. The most likely age of Jesus at the time of His death is somewhere between 37 and 41 based upon the most probable dates of birth and death.

Personally, I lean toward the 41, not because I turn 41 this year, but because of the testimony of Irenaeus and John 8:47 which has the Jews questioning Jesus: "You are not yet fifty years old, and have you seen Abraham?" If the Jews knew the age of Jesus, why didn’t they choose to say “You are not yet 40”? My guess is that Jesus must have exceeded the age of 40 but had not reached 50.

Next:

Does the idea that Jesus was in ministry for 7-11 years versus 1-3 years in popular thought, change your view of Jesus and His ministry?

In dealing with the dates of his birth, there are some irreconcilable differences. Quirinius was not a ruler while Herod the Great as alive. Both play into the nativity narratives. What does this say about Biblical inerrancy? Did Luke goof?

Jon Foreman: Compassion vs. Consumption Jon Foreman of Switchfoot fame writes an interesting article over at the Huffington Post. He basic point: we need to evaluate why we buy in our consumer society and redefine our ideas about wealth. Its a well written article that is intimate and thoughtful.

Yahoo Finance has an interesting article that shows what my dad has said for years: the rich are getting richer, the poor are getting poorer. Actually, Robert Merton coined the term the Matthew principle in 1968 with reference to this phrase. The problem, as I see it, is corporate greed and the individual greed that fuels it. Foreign workers are not the problem; it is the companies that are willing to exploit them.

The disparity of the rich and the poor will continue to become more marked. It will eventually fuel discontent. As one of my favorite bands, Adam Again, said years ago in their song Tree House that there is a tree house in the sky where the strong rule and they pulled up the ladder and children are left out of the tree house. "Someone throw the ladder down". We need some sort of reform or transformation to help those in power see their need to share the wealth in radical ways. I appreciate the Buffet and Gates” challenge to the super rich. But we need more than challenges, we need change.

Overall, my concern isn”t for the middle class of America. We are still the richest in the world. My concern is for the third world and the desperately poor. They will rise in judgment on the last day on our culture of luxury. But since we have the majority of the super rich in our country and the majority of the corporate gods, we have to work for reform in our country. We are the closest to the super rich and we have the vote to bring some change. We also can pray and enter into the battle for the hearts of the super rich.

Enough ranting for now…